The Role of Minimally Invasive Surgeries in Trauma.

This article delves into the role of minimally invasive surgeries in trauma, specifically laparoscopy and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). It discusses the benefits of laparoscopy over traditional laparotomy, including its accuracy in detecting peritoneal violation and intraperitoneal injuries caused by penetrating trauma. The article also explores the use of laparoscopy as an adjunct to nonoperative management of abdominal injuries and in cases of blunt trauma with unclear abdominal injuries. Furthermore, it highlights the benefits of VATS in diagnosing and treating thoracic injuries, such as traumatic diaphragmatic injuries, retained hematomas, and persistent pneumothorax.

No cupid, just an arrow: a penetrating injury into the interventricular septum.

BACKGROUND: Penetrating cardiac injuries are rare but often fatal, with 16-55% mortality. We report a patient who suffered a non-fatal occupational cardiac injury. CASE PRESENTATION: A 47-year-old man was operating an ironworker machine. A thin 3-cm metal fragment catapulted from the machine piercing the chest wall and the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), burrowing into the interventricular septum (IVS). The patient remained hemodynamically stable and walked to the nearest hospital. ECG-gated computed tomography revealed the exact location of the fragment within the IVS, allowing for detailed preoperative planning. The fragment was removed through a sternotomy and an incision through the RVOT. The postoperative course was uneventful. CONCLUSIONS: This case underscores the value of detailed preoperative imaging and the wide spectrum of clinical scenarios of penetrating cardiac injuries.

Early Abnormal Vital Signs Predict Poor Outcomes in Normotensive Patients Following Penetrating Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Because trauma patients in class II shock (blood loss of 15%-30% of total blood volume) arrive normotensive, this makes the identification of shock and subsequent prognostication of outcomes challenging. Our aim was to identify early predictive factors associated with worse outcomes in normotensive patients following penetrating trauma. We hypothesize that abnormalities in initial vital signs portend worse outcomes in normotensive patients following penetrating trauma. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed from 2006 to 2021 using our trauma database and included trauma patients presenting with penetrating trauma with initial normotensive blood pressures (systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg). We compared those with a narrow pulse pressure (NPP ≤25% of systolic blood pressure), tachycardia (heart rate ≥100 beats per minute), and elevated shock index (SI ≥ 0.8) to those without. Outcomes included mortality, intensive care unit admission, and ventilator use. Chi-squared, Mann-Whitney tests, and regression analyses were performed as appropriate. RESULTS: We identified 7618 patients with penetrating injuries and normotension on initial trauma bay assessment. On univariate analysis, NPP, tachycardia, and elevated SI were associated with increases in mortality compared to those without. On multivariable logistic regression, only NPP and tachycardia were independently associated with mortality. Tachycardia and an elevated SI were both independently associated with intensive care unit admission. Only an elevated SI had an independent association with ventilator requirements, while an NPP and tachycardia did not. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate trauma bay NPP and tachycardia are independently associated with mortality and adverse outcomes and may provide an opportunity for improved prognostication in normotensive patients following penetrating trauma.

Screening for Intimate Partner Violence in Trauma: Results of a Quality Improvement Project.

INTRODUCTION: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is common, especially among patients presenting with traumatic injury. We implemented an IPV screening program for patients admitted after trauma. We sought to determine whether specific demographic or clinical characteristics were associated with being screened or not screened for IPV and with IPV screen results. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study evaluating all patients admitted after trauma from July 2020-July 2022 in an Adult Level 1 Trauma Center. RESULTS: There were 4147 admissions following traumatic injury, of which 70% were men and 30% were women. The cohort was 46% White, 20% Asian, 15% Black, and 17% other races. Twenty-three percent were Hispanic or Latino/a. Seventy-seven percent were admitted for blunt injuries and 16% for penetrating injuries. Thirteen percent (n = 559) of the cohort was successfully screened for IPV. Screening rates did not differ by gender, race, or ethnicity. After adjustment for demographic and clinical factors, patients admitted to the intensive care unit were significantly less likely to be screened. Of the screened patients, 30% (165) screened positive. These patients were more commonly Hispanic or Latino/a, insured by Medicaid and presented with a penetrating injury. There were no differences in injury severity in patients who screened positive versus those who screened negative. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant barriers to universal screening for IPV, including injury acuity, in patients admitted following trauma. However, the 30% rate of positive screens for IPV in patients admitted following trauma highlights the urgent need to understand and address barriers to screening in trauma settings to enable universal screening.

Risk Factors and Management of Blunt Inferior Vena Cava Injury: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic inferior vena cava (IVC) injuries are uncommon, but the mortality rate remains high at 38-70%. To date, most studies on traumatic IVC injuries have evaluated blunt rather than penetrating injuries. We aimed to identify the clinical features and risk factors that affect the prognosis of patients with blunt IVC injuries to improve treatment strategies for these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with blunt IVC injury over 8 years at a single trauma center. Clinical and biochemical parameters; transfusion, surgical, and resuscitation methods; associated injuries; intensive care unit stay; and complications data were compared between survival and death groups to identify clinical features and risk factors of blunt IVC injury-related mortality. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients with blunt IVC injury were included during the study periods. Twenty-five (89%) patients underwent surgical treatment, and the mortality was 54%. The mortality rate according to the IVC injury location was the lowest for supra-hepatic IVC injury (25%, n = 2/8), whereas it was the highest for retrohepatic IVC injury (80%, n = 4/5). In the logistic regression analysis, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.566, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.322-0.993], p = 0.047) and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion for 24 h (OR = 1.132, 95% CI [0.996-1.287], p = 0.058) were independent predictors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Low GCS score and high-volume packed RBC transfusion requirements for 24 h were significant predictors of mortality in patients with blunt IVC injuries. Unlike IVC injuries caused by penetrating trauma, supra-hepatic IVC injuries caused by blunt trauma have a good prognosis.

Management of Vascular Injuries in Penetrating Trauma.

Management of vascular trauma remains a challenge and traumatic injuries result in significant morbidity and mortality. Vascular trauma can be broadly classified according to mechanism of injury (iatrogenic, blunt, penetrating, and combination injuries). In addition, this can be further classified by anatomical area (neck, thoracic, abdominal, pelvic, and extremities) or contextual circumstances (civilian and military).

[Selective nonoperative management (SNOM) for penetrating abdominal wounds]. / Primenenie taktiki SNOM (selective nonoperative management) u postradavshikh s pronikayushchimi koloto-rezanymi raneniyami bryushnoi polosti.

The authors summarize the world experience in the management of patients with penetrating abdominal wounds. A gradual transition from the concept of «mandatory laparotomy¼ to selective management and active-expectant approach in appropriate cases is described.

Penetrating Head and Neck Trauma: A Narrative Review of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Treatment Protocols.

Penetrating injury to the head and neck accounts for a minority of trauma but significant morbidity in the US civilian population. The 3-zone anatomical framework has historically guided evaluation and management; however, the most current evidence-based protocols favor a no-zone, systems-based approach. In stable patients, a thorough physical examination and noninvasive imaging should be prioritized, with surgical exploration of the head and neck reserved for certain circumstances. Diagnostic and management decisions should be tailored to the mechanism of injury, history, physical examination, experience of personnel, availability of equipment, and clinical judgment.

The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale for Spleen Does Not Equally Predict Interventions in Penetrating and Blunt Trauma.

BACKGROUND: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Organ Injury Scale (OIS) for the spleen (and other organs) was created in 1989. It has been validated to predict mortality, need for operation, length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit (ICU) LOS. PURPOSE: We aimed to determine if the Spleen OIS is applied equally to blunt and penetrating trauma. RESEARCH DESIGN/STUDY SAMPLE: We analyzed the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database from 2017-2019, including patients with spleen injuries. DATA COLLECTION: Outcomes included the rates of mortality, operation, spleen-specific operation, splenectomy, and splenic embolization. RESULTS: 60900 patients had a spleen injury with an OIS grade. Mortality rates increased in Grades IV and V for both blunt and penetrating trauma. In blunt trauma, the odds for any operation, spleen-specific operation, and splenectomy increased, for each increase in grade. Penetrating trauma showed similar trends in grades up to grade IV, but were statistically similar between grade IV and V. Splenectomy was higher in penetrating trauma for all grades. Splenic embolization peaked at 25% of grade IV trauma before decreasing in grade V. Rates in penetrating trauma were significantly lower in all grades, peaking at 2.5% of Grade III injuries. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism of trauma is a significant factor for all outcomes, independent of AAST-OIS. Hemostasis is predominantly surgical in penetrating trauma, achieved with angioembolization more frequently in blunt trauma. Penetrating trauma management is influenced by the potential for injury to peri-splenic organs.

Contemporary management and outcomes of penetrating colon injuries: Validation of the 2020 AAST Colon Organ Injury Scale.

INTRODUCTION: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Colon Organ Injury Scale (OIS) was updated in 2020 to include a separate OIS for penetrating colon injuries and included imaging criteria. In this multicenter study, we describe the contemporary management and outcomes of penetrating colon injuries and hypothesize that the 2020 OIS system correlates with operative management, complications, and outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients presenting to 12 Level 1 trauma centers between 2016 and 2020 with penetrating colon injuries and Abbreviated Injury Scale score of <3 in other body regions. We assessed the association of the new OIS with surgical management and clinical outcomes and the association of OIS imaging criteria with operative criteria. Bivariate analysis was done with χ 2 , analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis, where appropriate. Multivariable models were constructed in a stepwise selection fashion. RESULTS: We identified 573 patients with penetrating colon injuries. Patients were young and predominantly male; 79% suffered a gunshot injury, 11% had a grade V destructive injury, 19% required ≥6 U of transfusion, 24% had an Injury Severity Score of >15, and 42% had moderate-to-large contamination. Higher OIS was independently associated with a lower likelihood of primary repair, higher likelihood of resection with anastomosis and/or diversion, need for damage-control laparotomy, and higher incidence of abscess, wound infection, extra-abdominal infections, acute kidney injury, and lung injury. Damage control was independently associated with diversion and intra-abdominal and extra-abdominal infections. Preoperative imaging in 152 (27%) cases had a low correlation with operative findings ( κ coefficient, 0.13). CONCLUSION: This is the largest study to date of penetrating colon injuries and the first multicenter validation of the new OIS specific to these injuries. While imaging criteria alone lacked strong predictive value, operative American Association for the Surgery of Trauma OIS colon grade strongly predicted type of interventions and outcomes, supporting use of this grading scale for research and clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Comprehensive Management of the Patient With Traumatic Cardiac Injury.

Cardiac injuries are rare but potentially life-threatening, with a significant proportion of victims dying before arrival at the hospital. The in-hospital mortality among patients who arrive in-hospital alive also remains significantly high, despite major advancements in trauma care including the continuous updating of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) program. Stab and gunshot wounds due to assault or self-inflicted injuries are the common causes of penetrating cardiac injuries, while motor vehicular accidents and fall from height are attributable causes of blunt cardiac injury. Rapid transport of victim to trauma care facility, prompt recognition of cardiac trauma by clinical evaluation and focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination, quick decision-making to perform emergency department thoracotomy, and/or shifting the patient expeditiously to the operating room for operative intervention with ongoing resuscitation are the key components for a successful outcome in cardiac injury victims with cardiac tamponade or exsanguinating hemorrhage. Blunt cardiac injury with arrhythmias, myocardial dysfunction, or cardiac failure may need continuous cardiac monitoring or anesthetic care for operative procedure of other associated injuries. This mandates a multidisciplinary approach working in concert with agreed local protocols and shared goals. An anesthesiologist has a pivotal role to play as a team leader or member in the trauma pathway of severely injured patients. They are not only involved in in-hospital care as a perioperative physician but also participate in the organizational aspects of prehospital trauma systems and training of prehospital care providers/paramedics. There is sparse literature available on the anesthetic management of cardiac injury (penetrating as well as blunt) patients. This narrative review discusses the comprehensive management of cardiac injury patients, focusing on the anesthetic concerns and is guided by our experience in managing cardiac injury cases at Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Center (JPNATC), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. JPNATC is the only level 1 trauma center in north India, providing services to a population of approximately 30 million with around 9000 operations being performed annually.

Introduction of Laparoscopy in an Urban High-Volume Sub-Saharan Trauma Centre.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma is a major disease burden in low and middle-income countries like South Africa. Abdominal trauma is one of the leading reasons for emergency surgery. The standard of care for these patients is a laparotomy. In selected trauma patients, laparoscopy has both diagnostic and therapeutic usage. The trauma burden and the number of cases seen in a busy trauma unit make laparoscopy challenging. AIM: We wanted to describe our journey with laparoscopy in the management of abdominal trauma in a busy urban trauma unit in Johannesburg, South Africa. METHODS: We reviewed all trauma patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) or therapeutic laparoscopy (TL) between 01 January 2017 and 31 October 2020 for blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. The demographic data, indications for laparoscopy, injuries identified, procedures performed, intraoperative laparoscopic complications, conversion to laparotomy, morbidity, and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients who had laparoscopy were included in the study. The median age was 29 years (IQR 25-25). Most injuries were penetrating 85.2% (n = 46/54) and 14.8% blunt trauma. Most patients were males, 94.4% (n = 51/54). Indications for laparoscopy included diaphragm evaluation (40.7%), pneumoperitoneum for evaluation of potential bowel injury (16.7%), free fluid with no evidence of solid organ injury (12.9%) and colostomy (5.5%). There were 8 (14.8%) cases converted to laparotomy. There were no missed injuries or mortality in the study group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy in selected trauma patients is safe even in a busy trauma unit. It is associated with less morbidity and shortened hospital length of stay.

Blunt and Penetrating Airway Trauma.

Airway injury, be that penetrating or blunt, is a high-stakes high-stress management challenge for any airway manager and their team. Penetrating and blunt airway injury vary in injury patterns requiring prepracticed skills and protocols coordinating care between specialties. Variables including patient cooperation, coexisting injuries, cardiorespiratory stability, care location (remote vs tertiary care center), and anticipated course of airway injury (eg, oxygenating well and comfortable vs increasing subcutaneous emphysema) all play a role in determining airway if and when airway management is required. Direct airway trauma is relatively infrequent, but its presence should be accompanied by in-person or virtual otolaryngology support.

A Rare Case of Urinothorax as a Result of Penetrating Trauma.

Urinothorax, defined as urine within the pleural space, is an uncommon finding in published trauma literature. To date, there are less than ten recorded cases of non-iatrogenic trauma-induced urinothorax, most resulting from blunt traumatic injuries from motor vehicle collisions. Given the rarity of the condition, the diagnosis is often missed or delayed. Once the diagnosis is suspected, the most reliable finding is a pleural fluid to serum creatinine ratio of >1. A confirmed diagnosis of urinothorax then requires drainage of pleural fluid and management of distal ureteral obstruction. Unfortunately, the added complexity of the poly-trauma patient obscures this difficult diagnosis often leading to a delay in treatment and prolonged hospital stay. No current published literature exists on penetrating trauma as a cause of urinothorax. Here, we describe a unique case of urinothorax in a 32-year-old male as a result of penetrating trauma.

A Penetrating Lumbar Spine Injury With Misleading Neurological Symptoms.

Penetrating spinal injuries require specific neurosurgical attention. To date, there are no guidelines regarding emergency neurosurgical management of such injuries and the decision whether to operate is made individually, based on the neurological examination and the analysis of any imaging available. We report the case of a 22-year-old patient who sustained two gunshots in the thighs and one in the lumbar spine. Clinical examination revealed neurological deficit in both legs prevailing on the right side. Discussion between the radiologist and the neurosurgeon concluded to an injury to the left S1 nerve root within the spinal canal, and to the right sciatic nerve. Thus, there was no need for a decompressive laminectomy. In the light of the current literature, penetrating spinal injuries rarely require an extensive surgical exploration; indications for such a procedure include incomplete neurological deficit with persistent neurological compression, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and obvious instability. Furthermore, penetrating spinal injuries are rarely encountered, even for military neurosurgeons. Their surgical management and especially the need for laminectomy, stabilization, and dural sac watertight closure are still a matter of debate. An expert consensus statement would give food to surgeons facing penetrating spinal injuries.

[Acute care of soft tissue injuries in the head and neck region]. / Akutversorgung von Weichteilverletzungen im Kopf-Hals-Bereich.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue injuries are a common consequence of head and neck trauma. With injuries being highly individual and varying depending on the underlying trauma, it is difficult to establish standardized guidelines for head and neck trauma in general. The main goal of this study was to showcase the distribution of soft tissue injury types and the principles pertaining to acute care of the individual clinical presentations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was carried out using all trauma-relevant ICD-10 codes for trauma to the head (S00.- to S09.-) and neck (S10.- to S19.-) among patients who were treated at the authors' clinic-a certified national trauma center-during a period of 10 years (2012 to and including 2021). RESULTS: A total of 8375 patients with head and neck trauma were treated during the observation period, i.e., an average of 836 patients per year. Within this collective, 2981 trauma cases involving soft tissue injuries were documented. Superficial injuries to the head (S00.-) and open wounds to the head (S01.-) were the most common head and neck soft tissue injuries, with 1649 and 920 cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: The case numbers of soft tissue injuries generally show an inverse correlation to the required underlying trauma: diagnoses of the categories S00 and S01 occur very often; injuries which only occur after severe trauma, such as traumatic amputation at neck level (S18), are rare. According to current literature, penetrating neck traumas should be treated using a no-zone approach. In Europe, penetrating neck injuries are rather rare because of low crime rates and strict weapon laws.

Penetrating buttock trauma is morbid but rarely fatal - A South African experience.

BACKGROUND: Penetrating injuries to the buttock are relatively rare but are associated with significant morbidity. This study aimed to review our experience in managing penetrating trauma to the buttocks to contextualize the injury, document the most common associated injuries, and generate an algorithm to assist with the management of these patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at a major trauma center in South Africa over 8 years (January 2012 to January 2020). All patients presenting with a penetrating buttock injury were included. RESULTS: Our study included 40 patients. Gunshot wounds accounted for 93% (37/40), stab wounds accounted for 5% (2/40), and 1 case was gored by a cow. The majority (98%) underwent further investigation in the form of imaging or endoscopy. Forty percent (16/40) required surgical intervention. Of these 16 cases, 14 required a laparotomy, and 2 required gluteal exploration. Fifty-six percent (9/16) required a stoma. Five percent (2/40) experienced one or more complications, both of whom had stomas. The median length of stay for all patients was 3 days, whereas for the patients with stomas was 7 days. There were no ICU admissions or mortality in this study. Only 3 of the 9 stomas were reversed, and the median time to reversal was 16 months. CONCLUSION: Penetrating trauma to the buttock may result in injuries to surrounding vital structures, which must be actively excluded. Rectal injury was the most common injury, and most required a defunctioning colostomy as part of the management resulting in significant morbidity.

Protect That Neck! Management of Blunt and Penetrating Neck Trauma.

Blunt and penetrating vascular injuries to the neck represent a significant burden of mortality and disability among trauma patients. Blunt cerebrovascular injury can present with signs of stroke either immediately or in a delayed fashion. Most injuries are detected with computed tomography angiogram and managed by antiplatelet agents or unfractionated heparin. In contrast, for patients presenting with penetrating neck injuries, assessment for hard signs of vascular and aerodigestive injury should be done and prompt emergent surgical consultation if present. Overall management priorities for penetrating neck injuries focus on airway management, hemorrhage control, and damage control resuscitation before definitive surgical repair.

Thoracic Penetrating Wounds with Cardiac Injury: A Single-Center Experience.

Background: Management protocols for patients with penetrating cardiac injury have undergone a dramatic transition during the last decades. However, even today cardiac trauma remains a major medical problem. Methods: Retrospective single-center case series study, 41 patients with precordial wounds hospitalized at the Institute of Emergency Medicine, Chisinau, period 2005-2020. Mean age - 45.8 Ã+- 8.9 years, M:F/19.5:1. Traumatic event: stabbing (82.9%,n=34) or gunshot wound (17.1%,n=7). Preoperative paraclinical examinations: electrocardiography, chest X-ray, FAST, pleurotomy, pericardial puncture, and thoracoscopy. Results: 36 (87.8%) patients were hemodynamically unstable on hospitalization, and 19 (52.8%) were immediately transferred to the operating room. Preferred surgical access: left anterolateral thoracotomy - 26 (63.4%), right anterolateral thoracotomy - 13 (31.7%), and left posterolateral thoracotomy - 2 (4.9%). Non-penetrating lesions were discovered in 5 (12.2%) while penetrating trauma in other 36 (87.8%) cases, most frequently the right ventricle being injured. Additional intrathoracic lesions discovered in 29 (70.7%) patients: pulmonary parenchyma rupture - 25 (86.2%), internal mammary artery injury - 3 (10.3%), and intercostal artery injury - 1 (3.5%). The average length of stay was 13.2 Ã+- 4 days, including stay in the Intensive Care Unit - 2.9 Ã+- 1.2. Mortality rate -17.1% (n=7). Conclusions: Successful cardiac suture determined the survival rate of 82.9%. Lethality increases proportionally to the severity of the cardiac injury, the volume of blood loss, and damage to the right vs left heart chambers.

Civilian vascular trauma, treatment and outcome at a level 1-trauma centre.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after vascular injuries in wartime are well documented, but studies on vascular injuries in a civilian European populations are scarce. METHODS: A retrospective study on all adults admitted to a North-European level 1-trauma centre 2009-2018 with The Abbreviated Injury Scale-codes for non-iatrogenic vascular trauma (VT). Data were extracted from both national and regional trauma-registries, as well as patient charts. Patient demographics, mechanism, and location of vascular injury were registered as well as its treatment. Incidence and injury scores (ISS, NISS and TRISS) were calculated and overall survival (Kaplan-Meier) estimated. RESULTS: Of 4042 trauma-patients, 68 (1.7%) (median age 44 years, 76% males) sustained 81 vascular injuries (69 arterial; 12 venous); 46 blunt and 22 (32%) penetrating injuries. The total incidence of vascular injuries was 1.45/100,000 inhabitants and did not change over the study-period (95% confidence interval 1.13-1.82). The injuries were located in thorax (n = 17), neck (n = 16) and abdominal region (n = 15); most of the blunt injuries followed traffic (n = 31) or falling accidents (n = 10), and with 17 of the 22 penetrating injuries due to stabbing. The median ISS and NISS-scores were 22 and 33, with 50 (74%) and 55 (81%) patients having scores > 15, respectively. Forty-three (63%) patients had open surgical repair and 8 (12%) received endovascular treatment. Twenty-one patients died within 30-days (31%), 33% and 27% after blunt and penetrating injuries, respectively. Half of the patients that died within 24 h sustained aortic injury. CONCLUSIONS: Traumatic vascular injuries are rare in civilian settings and are less than 2% of major trauma admissions. These patients are often seriously injured and their treatment can be challenging with high 30-day mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.